The legacy of rwandas communitybased gacaca courts hrw. After two years of pretrial activity, nearly all of the 1,545 gacaca courts in rwanda formally began trials on saturday. The perpetrators and victims of the genocide continue to live together and therefore have to engage in a reconciliation process in order to. Gacaca courts originate from the traditional system of conflict resolution called gacaca. Gacaca courts in rwanda charges against the gacaca despite the governments aspirations for the gacaca process, some prominent ngos have contended that the system is fundamentally. Locating the short circuit in rwandas gacaca courts. Does the truth pass across the fire without burning. Documentaries tv broadcasts gacaca process perpetrator confessions kwibuka conferences. In 2001, in an attempt to clear the backlog of some 115,000 genocide cases awaiting trial, the rwandan government. Global tides volume 8 article 4 112014 an analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in postgenocide rwanda lauren haberstock pepperdine university, lauren.
The gacaca courts in rwanda article pdf available in african affairs 103410 january 2004 with 1,262 reads how we measure reads. Pdf after decades of cycling violence between hutu and tutsi groups in rwanda and burundi, violence peaked in 1994 with a genocide of tutsis in. Carter introduction the gacaca proceedings in rwanda are an innovative and unique response to a postconflict situation. Journal of contemporary criminal justice genocide, justice. Schabas abstract after many decades of impunity, rwanda has embarked upon a course of transitional justice committed to prosecuting all who are suspected of involvement in the 1994 genocide. Rwandas gacaca courts paul christoph bornkamm oxford. Gacaca court trial of prisoners genocide archive rwanda. The rwandan government began to gradually set up gacaca courts from 2002, so they could ensure their roll out was most effective penal reform international, 2010, p. Rwandas troubled gacaca courts africa criminal justice reform. Rwandas gacaca courts provide an innovative response to the genocide of 1994. Gacaca courts, reconciliation and the politics of apology in postgenocide rwanda callixte kavuro abstract in postconflict societies, the politics of apology is increasingly and heavily relied on for justice, accountability and reconciliation to be realised.
Incorporating elements of both african dispute resolution and of westernstyle criminal courts, gacaca courts are in line with recent trends to revive traditional grassroots mechanisms as a way of addressing a violent past. Rwanda has closed the local courts set up to try those accused of taking part in the 1994 genocide in the country. Jul 25, 2016 download the powerpoint presentation on revitalizing tradition to promote reconciliation learning from the gacaca courts in rwanda. Truth, justice, and reconciliation in postconflict. Unity and reconciliation in rwanda the reconciliation process in rwanda focuses on reconstructing the rwandan identity, as well as. The first phase, which began in 1997 and is still continuing, targets the most serious offenders. In response, the rwandan government has embarked on an experiment in mass justice. Although loosely based on a traditional dispute resolution process, 1 the current gacaca is a statutory creation. Gacaca courts date back to before rwanda was colonized bornkamm, 2012. The gacaca system and the international criminal tribunal. The establishment of gacaca courts in 2001 is one of the key landmarks of postgenocide rwanda. The recent commemoration activities brought new attention to the rwandan way of dealing with its violent past. Gacaca justice in postgenocide rwanda african studies quarterly.
Category 1 consisted of planners, organizers and framers of genocide or crimes. Gacaca courts, reconciliation and the politics of apology in. With retributive justice, the gacaca courts served to ensure that hutus did not escape revenge but did little to foster reconciliation. May 31, 2011 justice compromised the legacy of rwandas communitybased gacaca courts i. Gacaca courts were introduced in 1999 as a way of dealing with the hundreds of thousands of rwandans accused of involvement in the. The volume expands the knowledge regarding these courts, assessing not only their performance in terms of formal justice and.
The international criminal tribunal for rwanda and the nations domestic courts have struggled to bring them to trial. After ten years of controversial hearings, rwanda has closed its gacaca courts the local, informal trials were established to deal out justice. The norwegian helsinki committee has since early 1990s promoted accountability for crimes against humanity and war. Rwandans and the gacaca courts article pdf available in african journal of international and comparative law 181 may 2009 with 756 reads. Chakravartys central argument is that rwandas ruling party, the tutsidominated rwandan patriotic front rpf, used gacaca courts as a tool.
Gacaca definition of gacaca by the free dictionary. The system dealt mainly with civil and social conflicts between members of the community. Rwandas gacaca courts questioned 10 years on youtube. In such cases, transitioning societies have decided that criminal trials simply cannot address the wide scope of the crimes commit ted, bring to justice the large. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system. Jun 30, 2012 after ten years of controversial hearings, rwanda has closed its gacaca courts the local, informal trials were established to deal out justice to people accused of being involved in the genocide. Organic law n 0 402000 of 26012001 setting up and organizing prosecutions for offences constituting the crime of genocide or crimes against humanity committed between october 1, 1990 and december 31, 1994. The road to reconciliation in rwanda the role of gacaca courts.
Gacaca courts were thus not only a tool of retributive justice, but also focused on restorative justice kubai, 2007, p. Gacaca courts in rwanda yale journal of international affairs. Rwanda closes gacaca genocide courts rwanda news al jazeera. The gacaca courts in rwanda deal with those who participated in the genocide but were not leaders. Rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide. In february 1999, when the rwandan government was still debating the possibility of adapting gacaca to meet its needs, the united nations office of the high commissioner for human rights ohchr argued vehemently that communitybased courts were illequipped to handle complex. In the aftermath of the 1994 rwandan genocide, both the international community and the countrys new rpf. Abstract this essay explores how the gacaca courts system, a traditional system of dispute resolution, was revitalized after the 1994 genocide against the tutsi to promote national unity and reconciliation in. In the aftermath of the rwandan genocide the crippled formal judicial system failed to administer justice in a timely manner. Gacaca courts free download as powerpoint presentation. Jun 15, 2012 the establishment of gacaca courts in 2001 is one of the key landmarks of postgenocide rwanda.
Rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide success. It is often assumed that bringing victims and perpetrators of human rights violations together within structured processes of truthtelling, including apologies and. The current tutsiled government hails these courts as a success claiming they have provided postconflict justice like never before. A modified version of the traditional gacaca courts were introduced to hear cases from the backlog of over 100,000 genocide suspects.
One of rwandas final gacaca courts the community trials set up to try those accused of taking part in the countrys 1994 genocide. The justice and reconciliation process in rwanda the united. The rwandan government implemented the gacaca courts to promote reconciliation and enact justice following the. Jan 10, 2010 one of rwandas final gacaca courts the community trials set up to try those accused of taking part in the countrys 1994 genocide. The reason for this approach is to demand a public apology from perpetrators. Gacaca courts, reconciliation and the politics of apology. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court. Only 118 such courts had previously conducted trials, a kind of pilot program for the gacaca system.
Against this backdrop, the rwandan government has reinvented traditional gacaca courts to prosecute genocide and other crimes against humanity. To deal with such an overwhelming number of perpetrators, a judicial response was pursued on three levels. Additionally, the refusal of the kagame government to allow for the prosecution of rpf crimes to be tried in gacaca courts empowers the notion that tutsi survival. From the outset, most international observers fiercely opposed the use of gacaca for trying genocide crimes. Gacaca how rwanda judged its genocide by phil clark. This essay explores how the gacaca courts system, a traditional system of dispute resolution, was revitalized after the 1994 genocide against the tutsi to promote national unity and reconciliation in. Questions about the gacaca courts in rwanda opinio juris. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of rwandas justice and reconciliation programme. Final monitoring and research report on the gacaca process. Brouwer and sandra ka hon chu, gacaca courts in rwanda. A traditional rwandan system of justice in which local community members are allowed to testify freely, without the participation of lawyers, and cases. Genocide, justice, and rwandas gacaca courts experts. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in post.
An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in postgenocide rwanda lauren haberstock pepperdine university, lauren. The work was carried out with support from the belgian. In february 1999, when the rwandan government was still debating the possibility of adapting gacaca to meet its needs, the united nations office of the high commissioner for human rights ohchr argued vehemently that communitybased courts were illequipped to handle complex genocide. This article is part of an eir series marking the twentieth commemoration of the rwandan genocide since their inception, images of and commentaries on the gacaca courts dealing with crimes related to the 1994 genocide in rwanda travelled across the globe.
N2 more than one million people participated in the 1994 genocide against the rwandan tutsi. Acknowledgements we would like to express our heartfelt thanks to the various stakeholders whose combined efforts. Jun 02, 2017 chakravartys central argument is that rwandas ruling party, the tutsidominated rwandan patriotic front rpf, used gacaca courts as a tool of patronage to build the new, postgenocide. After years of recording and supporting a greater understanding of the gacaca jurisdictions, pris monitoring and research programme came to a close as the government of rwanda wound up this system of communitybased courts for prosecuting genocide suspects. Download the powerpoint presentation on revitalizing tradition to promote reconciliation learning from the gacaca courts in rwanda. But its detractors, which include major human rights organizations, believe the system has serious shortcomings. Since 1994 the government has struggled to administer justice to hundreds of thousands of genocide suspects. More than one million people participated in the 1994 genocide against the rwandan. Summary of the report presented at the closing of the gacaca courts activities snjg. Combining both legal and empirical research, this book explores the statutory aspects and practice of gacaca courts inkiko gacaca, the centrepiece of rwandas postgenocide transitional justice system, assessing their contribution to truth, justice and reconciliation. Justice compromised the legacy of rwandas communitybased gacaca courts i. A collection of quotes about the gacaca court system in.
Mondays closure of the gacaca courts, which tried nearly two million people. The road to reconciliation in rwanda the role of gacaca. Truth, justice, and reconciliation in postconflict rwanda. Between them kalisa and his family have been convicted of. Rwanda closes gacaca genocide courts rwanda news al. In addition to the temporal jurisdiction which, incidentally, corresponds to rwandas unsuccessful proposal with respect to the ictr, the gacaca courts were also similar to the specialized chambers in that they applied the fourtier categorization of crimes. Looking at the mandate of the courts, the public nature of the courts, the composition of the courts, and the security of participants of the courts, we conclude that gacaca courts could have had a bigger impact on reconciliation. May 04, 2014 ii information regarding objectives and some of the accomplishments of the modern gacaca courts are based on a document distributed by the national service of the gacaca courts in june 2012 entitled. Dec 04, 2014 challenging this limited view, clark et al. In an earlier survey,53 percent of respondents said they were highly confident that gacacawould promote a lasting peace ballabola 2001. Rwanda to promote reconciliation after the 1994 genocide. Jul 15, 2012 gacaca courts were thus not only a tool of retributive justice, but also focused on restorative justice kubai, 2007, p. The gacaca system and the international criminal tribunal for.
Rwanda is about to complete one of the most ambitious transitional justice experiments in history, blending local conflictresolution traditions. This traditional, communal justice was adapted in 2001 to fit the needs of rwanda in the wake of the 1994 rwandan genocide where over an estimated. Rwandas use of transitional justice after genocide. Rwanda s gacaca courts provide an innovative response to the genocide of 1994. In 2001, in an attempt to clear the backlog of some 115,000 genocide cases awaiting trial, the rwandan government read more.
707 356 629 357 171 936 840 221 1470 1396 889 682 546 279 1074 1277 754 1627 979 397 213 1299 440 1023 33 276 380 859 1513 52 7 299 331 1040 699 209 702 1492 1009 1374 591 656 179 958 340 154